Kebanyakan orang melakukan upgrade dari komputasi 32-bit ke komputasi 64-bit untuk menembus batas RAM 4GB, tetapi bagaimana caranyajauh dapatkah Anda melewati batas itu begitu Anda sudah memasuki dunia komputer 64-bit?
Sesi Tanya & Jawab Hari ini hadir untuk memberi kami hak milik sub divisi SuperUser—a Stack Exchange, pengelompokan situs Q & A berbasis komunitas. Gambar oleh Petr Kratochvil.
Pertanyaan
Pembaca SuperUser KingNestor ingin tahu tentang berapa banyak RAM yang bisa disimpan oleh komputer 64-bit:
I’m reading through my computer architecture book and I see that in an x86, 32bit CPU, the program counter is 32 bit.
So, the number of bytes it can address is 2^32 bytes, or 4GB. So it makes sense to me that most 32 bit machines limit the amount of ram to 4gb (ignoring PAE).
Am I right in assuming that a 64bit machine could theoretically address 2^64 bytes, or 16 exabytes of ram?!
Exabytes yang Anda katakan? Sekarang, sekarang, mari jangan serakah. Kami akan senang memulai dengan satu atau dua terabyte.
Jawabannya
Jawaban atas pertanyaan KingNestor adalah perpaduan yang menarik dari pertimbangan praktis dan teoritis. Matt Ball melompat tepat dengan jawaban teoritis:
Theoretically: 16.8 million terabytes. In practice: your computer case is a little too small to fit all that RAM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#Limitations_of_practical_processors
Conrad Dean melompat dengan catatan tentang betapa tidak praktisnya untuk memaksimalkan batas RAM teoritis menggunakan teknologi hari ini:
To supplement Matt Ball’s answer, the current largest stick of RAM I can find on one particular online retailer is 32GB. It would take 32 of these to reach 1 terabyte. At about a half inch per stick this brings us to a devoted 16 inches of space on your motherboard for a terabyte of commercial ram. To reach 16.8 million terabytes would require a motherboard 4,242.42 miles. The distance from LA to NYC is about 2141 miles, so the motherboard would stretch across the country and back to accomodate that much RAM.
Clearly this is impractical.
How about we didn’t put our RAM all in one row like on most motherboards, but instead placed them side-by-side. I want to say the average stick of ram is about six inches long, so if we allow a half an inch for width, you can have a square unit of 12 sticks of ram in a 6 inch square. Let’s call this square a RAM-tile. A RAM-tile then holds 384GB of RAM. To reach the required 16.8 million terabytes in 384GB tiles would take 44.8 million tiles. Let’s be messy, and use square root of that to conclude that this will fit in a square of 6693 by 6694 tiles, or 13,386 by 13,388 feet, which is close enough to 2.5 feet squared, enough to cover downtown Seattle in shadow, as if they didn’t already have enough to complain about.
Akhirnya, David Schwartz mencatat bahwa bahkan batas teoritis akan macet oleh arsitektur CPU saat ini:
Note that no existing x86 64-bit processor can actually do this. Their caches don’t have enough tag bits, their address buses don’t have enough width, and so on. 46-bits (8TB) is the maximum for many modern x86 CPUs.
Memiliki sesuatu untuk ditambahkan ke penjelasan? Bicaralah di komentar. Ingin membaca lebih banyak jawaban dari pengguna Stack Exchange yang paham teknologi lainnya? Lihat diskusi lengkap di sini.
